# Handoff: milestone 3 implementation (from the UI design session) You wrote `docs/ui-design-brief.md` and asked for a design session. It ran on 2026-06-10, every decision made with Justin via AskUserQuestion, and it is done: nothing UI-shaped is left open. This doc tells you what exists now, what changed relative to your milestone 3 assumptions, and where to start. ## What exists now - `docs/ui-spec.md` is the normative spec. Page layout with wireframe, component tree, every interaction with trigger/behavior/states, API requirements, visual tokens for both themes, a testable accessibility checklist, 12 ordered implementation slices, and one-line rejected alternatives. Build from it without re-deciding; if you disagree with something, raise it with Justin, do not silently deviate. - `docs/mockup/index.html` is the approved visual reference (v2; Justin rejected v1 outright). It is a design artifact with stand-in layout and edges, not app code. To view: bake a live `/api/comparison` response into it (replace `__DATA__`, see `data.json` + `rendered.html` already there), open in a browser, `?dark` for the dark theme, narrow window for mobile. Match its look; do not port its code. ## Deltas against what you probably assumed for milestone 3 - The dashboard is not the fixed three-strategy comparison. Panels are a dynamic list (cap 6) of scenarios: one shared base `Config` plus sparse per-panel overrides and a strategy. The classic trio is just the default, loaded from a study preset module (`web/src/presets/deepfake-school.ts`) that owns all study copy, so no research question is hardcoded. - New endpoint needed, and it is slice 1, your Go territory: `POST /api/scenario` takes `{config, strategy}`, returns `{config, result, edges}` where `edges` is the deterministic topology as node-index pairs. This closes the topology gap flagged in the brief. The engine already has the graph; expose it. Same validation and 400-string behavior as comparison. tygo regen, determinism test on edges. `/api/comparison` stays as-is (parity table and external consumers). - The frontend fires one `/api/scenario` per panel in parallel, debounced 400 ms, atomic swap, keep-last-good on errors. No batch endpoint (rejected, one-liner in the spec). - The optimisation feature (your milestone 5) got its API shape reserved: `POST /api/optimize` goal-seek, request/response sketched in spec section 2. M3 ships no optimizer UI, only a layout that can host it. - In scope for M3 beyond what the brief listed: export (JSON, per-node CSV, PNG snapshot), both light and dark themes with a toggle, and mobile as a first-class target (Justin expects first contact by phone). Animated GIF/WebM export is explicitly post-M3. - The accessibility criteria your locked decisions called UNDEFINED are now defined: spec section 8 is the checklist, and slice 12 is the audit. - Pinia and Vue Router: decided not needed. Module-scope composable store, modal focus, one page. ## Calls Justin made explicitly (do not relitigate) - Focus view is a modal overlay (recommendation was expand-in-place). - Sharing is address-bar-only, no Share button, no toast (`history.replaceState` after every successful run). - Both themes ship, not light-only. - Dynamic panels, export, and the optimizer hook all came from him unprompted; they are wanted, not gold-plating. ## Method notes - Your working agreements stand: teaching-paced TDD on Go (slice 1 gets a micro-brief, failing test first, small annotated diffs, learning-log commit message); Vue/TS driven fast and mostly autonomously. - Justin's design bar is high. His words on the first mockup: "a very weak mishmash of elements"; he wants a clean, responsive SPA that "looks professional and feels amazing". The approved mockup is the bar: app shell, type scale, one card system, real SVG icons, consistent spacing. Never show him boxes-on-a-page, not even as an intermediate state demo. - Dev stack runs in the shared tmux session "spreadlab" (`./dev.sh`, API on :8080, Vite on :5173). Use it, do not spawn background tasks. - One shared percent formatter everywhere; the 82-vs-83 rounding mismatch already bit the mockup once (spec section 6). ## First steps Read `docs/ui-spec.md` end to end, view the mockup in both themes and at phone width, then propose the slice 1 plan (the `/api/scenario` endpoint) and start the usual loop. Spec section 10 is the full M3 slice order; each slice leaves the app shippable.